Delete Operation for Two Strings

Algorithms
Medium
Microsoft
72.1K views

Given two strings `word1` and `word2`, find the minimum number of steps required to make `word1` and `word2` the same. A step is deleting exactly one character. This relates to LCS.

Why Interviewers Ask This

Microsoft asks this problem to evaluate a candidate's ability to transform a complex deletion task into a classic dynamic programming subproblem. They specifically look for the insight that minimizing deletions is mathematically equivalent to maximizing the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS). This tests your pattern recognition skills and your capacity to reduce an O(N*M) brute force scenario into an optimized solution.

How to Answer This Question

1. Clarify the Goal: Immediately restate that deleting characters from both strings to match them is equivalent to finding the longest shared sequence of characters. 2. Define the Relationship: Explain that Total Steps = (Length of word1 - LCS) + (Length of word2 - LCS). 3. Choose the Algorithm: Propose Dynamic Programming as the standard approach for LCS, defining dp[i][j] as the LCS length for prefixes word1[0..i] and word2[0..j]. 4. Walk Through Logic: Detail the recurrence relation: if characters match, take diagonal + 1; otherwise, take max of left or top cell. 5. Optimize Space: Mention that while a 2D table works, you can optimize to O(min(N,M)) space using two rows, showing attention to resource efficiency valued at Microsoft.

Key Points to Cover

  • Recognizing the reduction from deletion problem to Longest Common Subsequence
  • Explicitly stating the mathematical relationship: Total Lengths - 2 * LCS
  • Defining clear DP state transitions for matching and non-matching characters
  • Discussing Time Complexity O(N*M) and Space Optimization techniques
  • Walking through a concrete small example like 'sea' and 'eat' to validate logic

Sample Answer

To solve this efficiently, I first realized that the minimum number of steps to make two strings identical by only deleting characters is directly tied to their Longest Common Subsequence. Instead of trying every possibl…

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Attempting a recursive brute-force solution without memoization, leading to Time Limit Exceeded errors
  • Confusing Longest Common Substring (contiguous) with Longest Common Subsequence (non-contiguous)
  • Failing to account for deletions required from both strings simultaneously in the final calculation
  • Overlooking edge cases where one string is empty or both strings are already identical

Sound confident on this question in 5 minutes

Answer once and get a 30-second AI critique of your structure, content, and delivery. First attempt is free — no signup needed.

Try it free

Related Interview Questions

Browse all 145 Algorithms questionsBrowse all 107 Microsoft questions