CAT 2020 Slot 3 VARC · Question 15
The passage below is accompanied by a set of questions. Choose the best answer
to each question.
I’ve been following the economic crisis for more than two years
now. I began working on the subject as part of the background to a novel, and soon realized
that I had stumbled across the most interesting story I’ve ever found. While I was beginning
to work on it, the British bank Northern Rock blew up, and it became clear that, as I wrote
at the time, “If our laws are not extended to control the new kinds of super-powerful,
super-complex, and potentially super-risky investment vehicles, they will one day cause a
financial disaster of global-systemic proportions.” . . . I was both right and too late,
because all the groundwork for the crisis had already been done—though the sluggishness of
the world’s governments, in not preparing for the great unraveling of autumn 2008, was then
and still is stupefying. But this is the first reason why I wrote this book: because what’s
happened is extraordinarily interesting. It is an absolutely amazing story, full of human
interest and drama, one whose byways of mathematics, economics, and psychology are both
central to the story of the last decades and mysteriously unknown to the general public. We
have heard a lot about “the two cultures” of science and the arts—we heard a particularly
large amount about it in 2009, because it was the fiftieth anniversary of the speech during
which C. P. Snow first used the phrase. But I’m not sure the idea of a huge gap between
science and the arts is as true as it was half a century ago—it’s certainly true, for
instance, that a general reader who wants to pick up an education in the fundamentals of
science will find it easier than ever before. It seems to me that there is a much bigger gap
between the world of finance and that of the general public and that there is a need to
narrow that gap, if the financial industry is not to be a kind of priesthood, administering
to its own mysteries and feared and resented by the rest of us. Many bright, literate people
have no idea about all sorts of economic basics, of a type that financial insiders take as
elementary facts of how the world works. I am an outsider to finance and economics, and my
hope is that I can talk across that gulf.
My need to understand is the same as
yours, whoever you are. That’s one of the strangest ironies of this story: after decades in
which the ideology of the Western world was personally and economically individualistic,
we’ve suddenly been hit by a crisis which shows in the starkest terms that whether we like
it or not—and there are large parts of it that you would have to be crazy to like—we’re all
in this together. The aftermath of the crisis is going to dominate the economics and
politics of our societies for at least a decade to come and perhaps longer.
Which one of the following, if true, would be an accurate inference from the first sentence of the passage?
- A.The author’s preoccupation with the economic crisis is not less than two years old.
- B.The economic crisis outlasted the author’s preoccupation with it.
- C.The author is preoccupied with the economic crisis because he is being followed.
- D.The author has witnessed many economic crises by travelling a lot for two years.
Sign in free to see the answer and the step-by-step solution.
Show answer