CAT 2017 Slot 1 VARC · Question 24
Do sports mega events like the summer Olympic Games benefit the host city
economically? It depends, but the prospects are less than rosy. The trick is
converting...several billion dollars in operating costs during the 17-day fiesta of the Games
into a basis for long-term economic returns. These days, the summer Olympic Games themselves
generate total revenue of $4 billion to $5 billion, but the lion's share of this goes to the
International Olympics Committee, the National Olympics Committees and the International Sports
Federations. Any economic benefit would have to flow from the value of the Games as an
advertisement for the city, the new transportation and communications infrastructure that was
created for the Games, or the ongoing use of the new facilities.
Evidence suggests that
the advertising effect is far from certain. The infrastructure benefit depends on the initial
condition of the city and the effectiveness of the planning. The facilities benefit is dubious
at best for buildings such as velodromes or natatoriums and problematic for 100,000-seat Olympic
stadiums. The latter require a conversion plan for future use, the former are usually doomed to
near vacancy. Hosting the summer Games generally requires 30-plus sports venues and dozens of
training centers. Today, the Bird's Nest in Beijing sits virtually empty, while the Olympic
Stadium in Sydney costs some $30 million a year to operate.
Part of the problem is that
Olympics planning takes place in a frenzied and time-pressured atmosphere of intense competition
with the other prospective host cities — not optimal conditions for contemplating the future
shape of an urban landscape. Another part of the problem is that urban land is generally scarce
and growing scarcer. The new facilities often stand for decades or longer. Even if they have
future use, are they the best use of precious urban real estate?
Further, cities must
consider the human cost. Residential areas often are razed and citizens relocated (without
adequate preparation or compensation). Life is made more hectic and congested. There are, after
all, other productive uses that can be made of vanishing fiscal resources.
The author feels that the Games place a burden on the host city for all of the following reasons EXCEPT that
- A.they divert scarce urban land from more productive uses.
- B.they involve the demolition of residential structures to accommodate sports facilities and infrastructure.
- C.the finances used to fund the Games could be better used for other purposes.
- D.the influx of visitors during the Games places a huge strain on the urban infrastructure.
Sign in free to see the answer and the step-by-step solution.
Show answer